Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5630 13
Original file (NR5630 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
I

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

704 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204

JBH
Docket No. NR5630-13
25 March 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval

record pursuant to the provisions

A three-member panel of the Board

of 10 USC 1552.

for Correction of Naval Records,

sitting in executive session, considered your application on

24 March 2014.
in7accordance with administrative

applicable to the proceedings of this Board.

Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed

regulations and procedures
Documentary material

considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with

all material submitted in support

applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board

considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 5420 PERS-806

dated a copy of

which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,

the Board found that the evidence

submitted was insufficient to

establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. in
making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the

comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and votes of the members of

application has been denied.

Accordingly, your

the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

Favorable action cannot be taken.

You are entitled to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence

or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

In this

regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of

requiarity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when

applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure: NPC Memo 5420 PERS-806 dated

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6824 13

    Original file (NR6824 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 5420 PERS-806 dated a a copy of which is attached. applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8259 13

    Original file (NR8259 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO8259-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4190 14

    Original file (NR4190 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2459 14

    Original file (NR2459 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. n making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14

    Original file (NR5864 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6440 13

    Original file (NR6440 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted jn support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5641 13

    Original file (NR5641 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application on 94 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 5420 PERS -836 dated a. a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12993 11

    Original file (12993 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 5420 PERS-912 dtd 30 March 2012, a COpy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7112 14

    Original file (NR7112 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In additicn, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 5420 PERS- 836/149 dtd 29 Dec 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7112-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8074 14

    Original file (NR8074 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. In addition, the Board ‘considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 5420 PERS~-80 dated 9 Dec 14, a copy of which is attached. NR8074-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.